• CraigRhinehart

Content at Rest or Content in Motion? Which is Better?

Updated: Feb 20


Content at Rest or Content in Motion?


I really wish I’d thought of this concept but I didn’t. It’s such a simple idea when you think about it … that there are two fundamental types of content … enterprise content at rest and enterprise content in motion.


Content at Rest = Cost / Risk


Enterprise content at rest is sitting around just taking up space. At rest implies not being accessed … not being used … not doing anything of value. (Hhhmm … this sounds a lot like my Uncle Leo around the holidays. I have this mental image of him asleep on my couch one Thanksgiving surrounded by several beer cans. Sorry for sharing.) 


Anyway … when at rest, this content usually includes duplicates and near-duplicates making the problem worse. Content at rest drives significant and unnecessary costs in the form of storage, power, system administration and more. Worse yet, all this unnecessary content is ruining our search experiences. We can’t find anything because of all this useless content just hanging around gumming up our search results. Boy, this sounds dumb. Maybe we should start disposing of some of this stuff?


Content in Motion = Value / Reward


On the other hand, enterprise content in motion is highly valuable and rewarding. Content that is part of business process or case management enabling better decisions and outcomes … or content that is community and social-oriented driving better collaborative experiences and outcomes … or content that is being analyzed to unlock business insight across large amounts of unstructured data. Sounds awesome, doesn’t it?  Let’s put all that content to work for us! (Reminds me of my Aunt Marge … who never stops cleaning, cooking, running errands taking care of the family's critical stuff.  How Leo and Marge have stayed married all these years is beyond me).


What To Do With All That Content


If we’re agreed that it's far more valuable to activate content, then how do we go about it? … and more importantly, how do we pay for it?


Today, over 80% of most IT budgets are already allocated to managing existing “stuff” … programs, systems, storage including all that costly content at rest. With information expected to grow 44 times by 2020.  This is a failure scenario.  IT budgets are flat or declining in most organizations so at current course and speed we’ll increasingly be spending 83%, 88%, 95% and eventually all of our IT budget on managing existing “stuff”.  This leaves very little or no money to invest in new ECM initiatives that drive value … like those that activate content and put content in motion.


And those who say … “but storage is always getting cheaper, so no big deal” should probably stop reading here because you won’t like what is coming next. Storage may indeed be getting cheaper but the people, power, maintenance, physical space that it requires to work is not. It’s was a dumb argument yesterday, a ridiculous one today and an untenable one going forward. Most IT budgets already spend 17% on storage (yikes), which ought to be plenty.


Action Plan to Activate Content and Drive Value


Let’s just stop the madness and put much more focus, energy and budget on delivering value through content in motion!  Here are some basic steps you can take right now:


1. Think and act differently … it’s really about the communities, the processes and the insight related to your content.  Use and value come from activity, not stagnation.

2. Defensibly dispose of everything you can, including retiring old content-centric apps, abandoned SharePoint sites, unused file shares as soon as you can … except what you are obligated to keep for business, regulatory or legal purposes.  Big hint: This will free up loads of resources and budget that can be reallocated to new projects, like activating content.

3. Work with your line-of-business execs in three areas to activate content: Case Management:  Automate and improve those workflows and processes that are case-centric where people, process and content are essential to the outcome.  The more ad-hoc and exception-oriented processes drive maximum content value … think claims processing, dispute resolution, customer inquiry, investigation, onboarding and more.

Responsible Social Content:  Enable a true social content experience for knowledge works where projects, activities, instant collaboration, tasks and ECM services are the norm.  Think Facebook + ECM for the enterprise … combine ECM, social software and a more responsible approach to content collaboration.

Content Analysis:  Leverage and exploit your content by understanding the trends, patterns, anomalies and deviations of your business that are currently trapped in your content. Think Business Intelligence for content and detect fraud, predict outcomes, find new opportunities, hear the voice-of-the-customer and more.


I think it’s obvious by now which is better … or in other words, we should all be more like my Aunt Marge and not my Uncle Leo (he snores when he naps, too). 


Toby Bell (former Gartner ECM analyst) made the “content at rest” and “content in motion” remarks which got me thinking along these lines. I’ve taken Toby’s idea and added my own perspective. I also discussed this concept at this weeks Managing Electronic Records Conference in Chicago and received positive feedback from the audience and a few individuals afterward.


As always … leave me your thoughts and ideas here.


#Sedona #email #textanalytics #archiving #security #compliance #SNIA #ECM #CGOC #IBMInfoGov #AIIM #contentanalytics #IMRM #enterprisesearch #RIM #social #ARMA #ILM #privacy #eDiscovery #cloud #IRM #analytics #classification #categorization #ACM #infogov #DLP #IBMECM #cloudcomputing #search

1 view0 comments